|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
hired goon
   |
Posted - 2005.08.22 10:53:00 -
[1]
But isn't all 0.0 'high risk' anyway? If a high-risk marker is added with Jercho/o-syn next to it, better also put Doom, Epic, and also Evol (I think I've seen them around recently)
Because (not to flame or anything, this is from my own experience) DOOM corp is more of a danger around that area, not least because they spread out over PB more and shoot neutrals.
Infact, it is debatable Jericho/o-syn need a high-risk at all since they are only a risk to some corps, not all corps like DOOM. A generic high-risk though might be ok.
But then again, I wonder if all 0.0 isn't high risk anyway, so do we put that marker everywhere? Or not, leaving players to assume the obviousness that all 0.0 is dangerous anyway? Then we are back to square one.
------------
We come in peace. And tanks. |
hired goon
|
Posted - 2005.12.23 20:21:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Heritor
Who are these pirates you talk about at location 1 in PB ???
I have been resident there a long time and not many pirates come thru that way only northern aliances sitting on gate to torrinos 
I have to agree with my noble but slightly annoying enemy here. 'pirate infestation' is much much too harsh for Pure Blind. Maybe take off the word 'infestation' and it would be more accurate.
-omg-
|
hired goon
|
Posted - 2006.01.05 22:44:00 -
[3]
Once again I ask the 'pirate infestation' marker be removed from Pure Blind. There is no pirate infestation and as a regular traveller I should know. I ask any other residents to come forward in support of this (including Jericho Fraction and PLYT).
And if anyone has any reason why it should remain, please speak up also.
-omg-
|
hired goon
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 14:32:00 -
[4]
Better chance number 12 from BOB VS IRON to BOB/5 vs IRON/G.
-omg-
|
hired goon
|
Posted - 2006.01.09 15:00:00 -
[5]
Edited by: hired goon on 09/01/2006 14:59:53
Originally by: TWD
Originally by: hired goon
Better chance number 12 from BOB VS IRON to BOB/5 vs IRON/G.
Don't bother, we've pulled down our online POS'.
I can verify this.
-omg-
|
hired goon
|
Posted - 2006.01.09 15:20:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Boonaki
Can remove BoB vs IRON in Dek.
I verify this too. Pwnt 
-omg-
|
hired goon
|
Posted - 2006.01.09 15:32:00 -
[7]
Originally by: pershphanie
Edited by: pershphanie on 09/01/2006 03:39:29
Originally by: StoreSlem
Edited by: StoreSlem on 07/01/2006 16:32:28
I would dispute FE's claim to Geminate, FE doesn't really have a presense there. See a lot more of FOE and Stella Nova and Big Blue guys there anyways.
Big blue and stella nova are in geminate with FE's permission. If the map maker thinks foe has a big enough presence in geminate to warrent a warzone marker we will respect his decision. It is true that FE are primarily in venal atm however we will be back down to clear out the pirate activity in geminate shortly. Shooting at something else for a little while doesnt warrent 'losing space' (ex - see fountain and delve.)
I agree with this. Otherwise you might as well have un-claimed Delve, Fountain, and Period Basis for BoB while they were north.
Sorry about the amount of replies, I'm frisky atm
-omg-
|
|
|
| |
|